10/27/08

Resolved: Know Colombia to Debate Colombia

Excerpt from the final presidential debate...

Senator McCain: But let me give you another example of a free trade agreement that Senator Obama opposes. Right now, because of previous agreements, some made by President Clinton, the goods and products that we send to Colombia, which is our largest agricultural importer of our products, is -- there's a billion dollars that we -- our businesses have paid so far in order to get our goods in there.

Because of previous agreements, their goods and products come into our country for free. So Senator Obama, who has never traveled south of our border, opposes the Colombia Free Trade Agreement. The same country that's helping us try to stop the flow of drugs into our country that's killing young Americans...

...Free trade with Colombia is something that's a no-brainer. But maybe you ought to travel down there and visit them and maybe you could understand it a lot better.

Senator Obama: Let me respond. Actually, I understand it pretty well. The history in Colombia right now is that labor leaders have been targeted for assassination on a fairly consistent basis and there have not been prosecutions.

And what I have said, because the free trade -- the trade agreement itself does have labor and environmental protections, but we have to stand for human rights and we have to make sure that violence isn't being perpetrated against workers who are just trying to organize for their rights, which is why, for example, I supported the Peruvian Free Trade Agreement which was a well-structured agreementBut I think that the important point is we've got to have a president who understands the benefits of free trade but also is going to enforce unfair trade agreements and is going to stand up to other countries.

1L Garcia: It would have been more powerful if Senator Obama could have answered "I have been there, actually.  Backpacked the country for 30 days back in law school."

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Garcia for President 2028-
Sign me Up!

Tezcatlipoca said...

Koki-
Modernist views engage us in binary thinking which limiting. Is it better to know something by experiencing it instead of just learning about it? In one example the loading of a cannon might require that an individual have experience (if the activity is so clear then experience might not be necessary) in order to ensure safety. On the other hand does one have to experience with drugs or infidelity in order to know that they are harmful and have negative consequences? In a post-modern world those in power will argue that one does not have to experience everything to know. Where one is positioned determines how one maneuvers